Class Conflict in Pakistan Society Essay

Conflict theorieConflict theories ar perspectives in social wisdom that emphasize the social, governmental, or material inequality of a social collection, that critique the broad socio- governmental system, or that differently detract from structural functionalism and ideological conservativism. Conflict theories draw attention to power differentials, such as trend conflict, and generally contrast historically dominant ideologies. It is therefore a macro level analysis of hunting lodge. Karl Marx is the forefather of the social conflict theory, which is a comp iodinnt of the 4 paradigms of sociology. Certain conflict theories set out to cotton up the ideological aspects inherent in traditional thought. Whilst m any of these perspectives hold parallels, conflict theory does not identify to a unified school of thought, and should not be confused with, for instance, peace and conflict studies, or any other specific theory of social conflicElite ClassDef- A group or screen of someones or a member of such a group or split up, enjoying superior intellectual, social, or frugal status-First, The occurrence is that the term and concept, elite group, is misrepresented and misunderstood in this country. Intriguingly, those who are theatrical role of the elite themselves carry out most of the anti-elite commentary. In fact, castigating the elite at popular forums is a way to pee-pee legitimacy that could lead to acquisition of greater power. While there is no doubt about the fact that Pakistans elite is irresponsible towards itself and the plurality, it was more interesting to see the gentleman refer to Asif Ali Zardari and Maulana Fazlur Rehman, Nawaz Shrif as part of the elite.Second, elite is not a static concept but is forever evolving. What constituted elite yesterday whitethorn not be the same today or even tomorrow. Historically and popularly, the elite referred to the landed-feudal group because this was the dominant group in an agrarian econom y like Pakistans. Later, as mentioned earlier, other groups were formed. The evolutionary movement also meant that newer elite groups emerged almost every decade callable to state patronage that replaced the traditional elite and the older ones merged into the newer formations.Third, the elite are not just a group, but also the boot of a process that facilitates a constant cycle of change in a society. In courtship of a powerful, yet easily manipulated state like Pakistan, the process of elite formation is directly united with the ability of a group to manipulate the state, its power and resources. This means that what may be the middle cast or start middle shed light on of yesterday can be the elite of today. For instance, who could imagine a few decades ago that one day, people belonging to lower middle or middle crystalize backgrounds, like Altaf Hussain, Qaim Ali Shah, Malik Riaz, Humayun Akhtar, Ijazul Haq, or Arsalan Iftikhar leave alone be powerful millionaires and part of the elite.Middle carve upThe middle class is a class of people in the middle of a societal hierarchy. In Weberian socio-economic terms, the middle class is the broad group of people in contemporary society who fall socio-economically between the working class and upper class. The common measures of what constitutes middle class vary significantly among cultures.As Dr Nayab postulates, to answer that question one first has to define what one means by middle class. She starts off by looking at standard economic renderings of what constitutes the middle class and applies a range of these definitions to the data to see how Pakistan fares. She uses 15 formulae, ranging from the definition of the middle class as those with 75 to 125% of the median income, to expenditure from $2 to $20 per person per day, to double the poverty line. Her results differ widely, ranging from a finding that there is no middle class in Pakistan, to the finding that 60% of the population can be defined as middle class.This composite list yields results that seem more intuitive. Dr Nayab entrap that in 2007/08, 41.9% of the population of Pakistan belonged to the lower-lower class or to be more blunt, the misfortunate. This dimension rose to 55% when exactly rural areas were considered. Aspirants to middle-classismconstituted 23% of the population, while climbers who are likely to bind there constituted another 15% or so. The hard-core middle class remained small at 4.3% of the population. But Dr Nayabs multiple classification of middle class makes more sensory faculty sociologically, as it seems more realistic to think of the middle class itself as a series of layers. lower class working class (or lower class, labouring class, sometimes proletariat) is a term used in thesocial sciences and in quotidian conversation to describe those employed in lower tier jobs (as measured by skill, education and lower incomes), often extending to those in unemployment or otherwise possess ing below-average incomes. Working classes are mainly found in industrializedeconomies and in urban areas of non-industrialized economies.InjusticInjustice is, the idea of not giving each person his or her fair due as a matter of right.Commonly Found Social Injustices A few commonly found social injustices in our society are 1. Unequal distribution of resources 2. Restricted access of common people to the quality education 3. Monopoly of rich class in the semipolitical system of the country 4. Lack of prefatorial health facilities to poor5. Non availability of necessary commodities to major portion of the population Place of Women in Society/ sex Violence. With the erosion of social values, the place of women in our society has also been lost sight of. It is most too bad that gender madness is a common norm of our social culture more so in backward and less educated segments of our society. Marriage System. Owing to lack of education and following outdated traditions, the system of marriage in Pakistan is being run on the primitive terms of ignorance. Place of women in society makes her rather a scape-goat for any matrimonial affair. She does not eat up any liberty to make conclusivenesss for her sprightliness partner less to decide about others. Violation of Human Rights.Pakistans record of human rights does not make her qualify to stand spirited in the comity of culturedized nations. Due to lack of education, poor social system and backwardness, violation of human rights is a common norm in Pakistan. And the worst impact of this are the women, children and the poor masses. Class Division of Society. Pakistani society is highly polarized and divided into various castes, classes, ghostlike affinities and political affiliation. This makes it highly vulnerable to be exploited by the elements working against Pakistan. Intolerant Society. We are an rigid society. This intolerance manifests itself in our social, religious and political activities. Our re lationships are characterized by unthinking support. There is little sense of accommodation for rivals or competitors or those who belong to another sect, region or ethnic group,political crisisThe political crisis in Pakistan threatens to trigger yet another period of instability in the country. The three-way power contend between the military, the government and the courts once again exposes the weaknesses of the countrys democratic institutions, say German commentators. The political drama playing out in Pakistan this week took another twist Tuesday when the countrys high court ordered the arrest of Pakistani Prime Minister Raja Pervez Ashraf on suspicions of corruption and nepotism. The suspicions have followed Ashraf for years, but the timing of the announcement now threatens to light a match on the countrys smoldering political crisis.Since Sunday self proclaimed revolutionary leader Muhammad Tahir-ul-Qadri has been leading a hold out manifest calling for the ouster of Paki stani President Asif Ali Zadari. Qadri, a moderate clergyman who has denounced corruption among the political class, has seen a meteoric rise to popularity over the last months. On Tuesday, hundreds of thousands of demonstrators joined his protest and packed capital of Pakistans streets. The courts announcement came in the middle of Qadris speech on Tuesday and the promote broke out in cheers at the intelligence information. On Wednesday, Qadri once again called for the end of the government.If these thieves hadnt control Pakistan, today every child in the country would have a smile on their face, he shouted to his followers. Meanwhile the countrys normally meddlesome military has been strangely silent in the midst of chaos. That silence has led some observers to believe that the countrys generals are behind Qadris campaign. The turmoil comes just weeks before Pakistans government was set to complete its five year term, a milestone in a country that normally experiences volatile shifts of power. At the same time violence has been growing with extremists attacking the government and religious minorities..THE PLANETARY CHALLENGEIf an alternative future for Pakistan is not created, the pendulum will continue with collapse always being in the background. Moreover, in the world we now live in, a weakness or pathology in any part of the planetary system threatens us all. Pakistans futures are part of the planets futures we all need to transform.Great Game.Pakistan remains a pawn, moved slightly for the strategic and ideological purposes of the great powers. Whether in proxy wars against the Russians or against 9/11 jihadis or whoever may be next, Pakistans capacity to influence its future is low or non-existent. At best, it can only rent out its military, or territory, for others battles. In this future (as in the current present), the rental receipts do not lead to even development they merely enrich those getting the rent, generally the military. The national post becomes not how to transform the great game but how to get a piece of the action, legitimately or illegitimately. Those not part of the money game sing songs of grand conspiracies. These songs take away agency. While Pakistan has a dependency relationship with the rest of the world, citizens have a dependency child/adult relationship with the government, expecting it to operate each and every problem, without taking responsibility for their own actions and blaming the government when it fails. At the collective level, Pakistan remains rudderless, evoking the spoken language of the founder, but unable to follow through with action.Economic InjusticeA few weeks ago the news was published that the Punjabgovernment had allotted 4,000 yards (or more) for Rs1,000 per person to multitudegenerals, including Gen Pervez Musharraf. The given argument was that they got cheap land because the area was not developed. The account statement of this country reveals that undeveloped area s get developed quickly where generals and army officials get land. Are army power the only bureaucrats serving this country? What about other people who are working in civil bureaucratic institutions and private organizations? Do they also get so many benefits as do the army personnel?Economic Progress, Stability are key to Pakistans futureArmy interfering in Pakistani politicsMany political parties claim that they do not want army to intermeddle in political issues and that army should be on borders doing its job. Recently there was a long march started by the lawyers and some political parties for the restoration of the deposed Chief justice. the protest became violent when the protesters started beating policemen. Later that nighttime General Ashfaq pervaiz kiyani talked to Prime minister Yousuf raza gilani and asked him to restore the deposed chief justice immediately. After which the prime minister yousuf raza gilani took the decision to restore the deposed cheif justice in front of the people of Pakistan. The decision was welcomed by parties like plmn and pti.All these parties which in old claimed that army should not interfere in politics did not even said a name against General Kiyani pressurizing an elected prime minister instead they welcomed the decision.Source http//www.defence.pk/forums/national-political-issues/23722-army-interfering-pakistani-politics.htmlixzz2IR33Mi2j