Culture Makes Better Future Essay

cultivation is sort of desire history or evolution. People make the slide of assuming history has a purpose or that evolution has a purpose. But in reality, history is ripe an aggregate of facts and opinions astir(predicate) the past. History, or the march of civilization, has no direction, no goal. Yes, we seem to be improving ourselves by certain metrics but that isnt an a priori requirement. Evolution is withal non striving towards any specific direction. We are not at the cutting edge of evolution in any sense.If in a million years, the organism that tramp survive on Earth outperform is an amoeba, then amoebae willing be the dominant species on the planet. Its not a better or worse situation (except maybe for us), it just is. Similarly it is not cultures job to create a better future. What does better even mean? Better for whom? At what terms for other entities? I imagine some cultures might like to occupy things slow and enjoy life, while others might believe in en ormous work hours and competitiveness. Whos the arbiter of better or worse present?Some culture might devalue women to the extent that it loses too galore(postnominal) of them and isnt able to effectively propagate itself, effectively dying out. Im sure people from that culture wouldnt be laughing(prenominal) about that, although its good in some universal sense. market-gardening exists to propagate itself, not to do any good or no-account for the people who follow it. My thoughts here are more or slight para-phrasings of the discussion on memes from The Selfish Gene. Culture at best, creates a emotion of societal cohesion, a generalized patriotism that can shackle its members to perform better against other cultures.I dont guess it makes any sense in asking if culture is good for youthfulness and province because that assumes that there is an alternative to culture, a state of diminished culture, or non-culture. Thats not going to happen ever. Culture doesnt throw in a vacuum to exist something always rushes in to take up the empty space. You might mean instead mean to ask about the importance of a countrys indigenous culture for that countrys progress, in the context of foreign culture having undesired influences. To that I say, let the fittest survive.I dont believe in feeling guilty or upset about, for example, Indian culture becoming westernized. If a culture is strong enough, itll adapt itself to new challenges. If not, too bad. Just like there have been millions of species that are now extinct, and also millions more than can arise given the appropriate conditions on Earth culture, like life, will always be around in some form or the other. And just like you cant say that any particular bird or animal or virus is better for nature, you sincerely just cant discuss how culture is better for our future.